Autonomous boat design

Redesigning survey vessels for mass production

Industrial design

Renderings of the CGR Dashboard landing page and the Norway dashboard as product examples.

Context

Platypus LLC’s legacy water survey boats were highly functional but plagued by a massive manufacturing bottleneck. Because they were hand-produced and custom-assembled, the production process was tedious, time-consuming, and entirely unscalable.

Context

Platypus LLC’s legacy water survey boats were highly functional but plagued by a massive manufacturing bottleneck. Because they were hand-produced and custom-assembled, the production process was tedious, time-consuming, and entirely unscalable.

Challenge

Led the end-to-end redesign of three vessel hulls, transitioning the fleet to mass production by engineering a standardized, rotomolded body featuring prefabricated modular sensor bays and off-the-shelf component integration.

Challenge

Led the end-to-end redesign of three vessel hulls, transitioning the fleet to mass production by engineering a standardized, rotomolded body featuring prefabricated modular sensor bays and off-the-shelf component integration.

Solution & Impact

Drastically accelerated production timelines by reducing manual assembly, while maintaining on-the-water stability. Result was highly rigid, ultra-durable hulls, including a flagship catamaran capable of supporting human weight.

Role

Lead industrial designer

Duration

2 months

Company

Platypus LLC

Skills

User research

UX/UI

Product management

Accessibility

Design system

Tools

Autodesk Fusion 360

"How might we transform a bespoke, hand-assembled robotic vessel into a mass-manufacturable hardware platform without losing deployment flexibility?"

Complex manufacturing

Hand-crafted assembly lines limited production volume, drove up unit costs, and introduced weaknesses in the vessel integrity.

High tooling stakes

Moving to rotomolding required expensive, irreversible tooling molds with zero margin for prototyping errors.

Component fragmentation

Accommodating various third-party marine sensors required custom engineering for every single client.

1

Audit & sourcing

Physical audit: Began by evaluating old CAD models and taking precise manual measurements of the legacy fleet to map out core size and volume requirements, internal payload dimensions, and component footprints.

COTS sourcing: To lower manufacturing friction, I executed a complete inventory of required operational components (propellers, hatches, hardware). I sourced standard, off-the-shelf (COTS) CAD models to use as fixed parameters for the hull architecture.

1

Audit & sourcing

Physical audit: Began by evaluating old CAD models and taking precise manual measurements of the legacy fleet to map out core size and volume requirements, internal payload dimensions, and component footprints.

COTS sourcing: To lower manufacturing friction, I executed a complete inventory of required operational components (propellers, hatches, hardware). I sourced standard, off-the-shelf (COTS) CAD models to use as fixed parameters for the hull architecture.

2

Modeling & benchmarking

CAD: I modeled the three hollow vessels, optimized for rotomolding, that could accommodate various internal and external sensors. I included built-in, prefabricated mounting points, allowing the standardized boats to host a wide array of specialized sensors natively without secondary post-mold drilling.

Benchmarking: Since the new vessels would be hollow plastic, ensuring structural integrity was paramount. I conducted research into modern kayak production to benchmark optimal wall-thickness variables and stress-bearing geometries.

3

Risk mitigation

De-risking buoyancy: Operating outside my core domain of naval engineering, I recognized a critical single point of failure… buoyancy. Because physical prototyping wasn't financially viable due to extreme tooling costs, I collaborated with an engineer to validate the water displacement and buoyancy limits digitally before giving the green light.

3

Risk mitigation

De-risking buoyancy: Operating outside my core domain of naval engineering, I recognized a critical single point of failure… buoyancy. Because physical prototyping wasn't financially viable due to extreme tooling costs, I collaborated with an engineer to validate the water displacement and buoyancy limits digitally before giving the green light.

4

Production handover

Manufacturer alignment: Sourced local rotomolding vendors and established a direct collaborative feedback loop with their producers. This cross-functional review ensured my digital models perfectly accounted for physical tooling constraints, draft angles, and material shrinkage rates.

Technical documentation: Generated and delivered comprehensive technical drawing packages and manufacturing-ready documentation.

4

Production handover

Manufacturer alignment: Sourced local rotomolding vendors and established a direct collaborative feedback loop with their producers. This cross-functional review ensured my digital models perfectly accounted for physical tooling constraints, draft angles, and material shrinkage rates.

Technical documentation: Generated and delivered comprehensive technical drawing packages and manufacturing-ready documentation.

Solution

From hand made hulls to modular manufacturing

Unification: Redesigned all three boat sizes under a cohesive design language with integrated logo, optimizing each for the realities of industrial rotomolding while cutting assembly steps.

Modular design: Designed the hulls to host both custom and off-the-shelf components and hardware, both internally and externally, allowing for flexible but easier assembly.

Structural integrity: Strategic structural ribbing added during the digital modeling phase allowed the hollow plastic hulls to withstand harsh field operations. The largest catamaran model proved rigid enough to comfortably support human weight.

Deployment: On-the-water validation confirmed that the standardized hull dynamics performed as expected.

Were the challenges met?

Complex manufacturing

High tooling stakes

Component fragmentation

Reflections

My role: Served as the sole end-to-end product designer.

What went well

DFM mindset: Designing around kayak manufacturing methodologies and standard COTS parts eliminated dozens of downstream production hurdles and dramatically dropped assembly times.

Proactive collaboration: Partnering early with local manufacturers and cross-disciplinary engineers de-risked the high financial stakes of rotomold tooling, guaranteeing a successful first-run production.

What could be better

Testing & simulation: If time and resources would have allowed, I would have preferred to run in-depth simulations of the boat for hydrodynamics and structural integrity.

What could be better

Testing & simulation: If time and resources would have allowed, I would have preferred to run in-depth simulations of the boat for hydrodynamics and structural integrity.